Roof Framing Terms Posts
Roof Framing Terms Facts
1 Roof Framing Terms Loading
2 Roof Framing Terms Loading
3 Roof Framing Terms Loading
4 Roof Framing Terms Loading
5 Roof Framing Terms Loading
6 Roof Framing Terms Loading
Roof Framing Terms Facts in Q&A
In roof framing is a cross gable the same as a reverse gable? what is the difference between the two, is a reverse gable a type of dormer and a cross gable go to the foundation? or are they two terms for the same thing

thayo30 replied: "They are both essentially the same thing. Traditionally, a cross gable was built so that the ridge was built at the same height as the main roof and created a "t" with the peaks. Now, I think the two terms are pretty much interchangeable to describe a gable dormer built perpendicular to the main roof. Hope this helps."

How do I figure out the exact square footage? How do I figure out the exact square footage of a home. I don't mean of living space. What I am more looking for is the frame of the house. example exterior wood framing and sheathing, the frameing for the roof. or what is the mathmatics brought down to laymans terms.

Me replied: "You might need someone who is a carpenter or engineer to answer that one. Most of the people who answer questions in the math category could probably handle the mathematics behind it, but there probably aren't many who know the actual method of how they do it. If no one gives you an answer, try posting again in the engineering or home maintenance categories."

joke : Hick computer terms? Redneck computer terms Log On: Makin' the wood stove hotter. Log Off: Don't add no wood. Monitor: Keepin' an eye on the wood stove. Download: Gettin' the firewood off the pickup. Mega Hertz: When yer not careful down loadin'. Floppy Disk: Whatcha git from pilin' too much firewood. Ram: The hydrolic thingy that splits the firewood. Hard Drive: Getting' home in the winter season. Prompt: What you wish the mail was in the winter. Windows: What to shut when it's below 15 below. Screen: What 'cha need for the black fly season. Byte: That's what the flies do. Chip: What to munch on. Micro Chip: What's left in the bottom of the bag. Infrared: Where the left-overs go when Fred's around. Modem: What 'cha did to the hay fields. Dot Matrix: Farmer Matrix's wife. Lap Top: Where little kids feel comfy. Keyboard: Where ya hang your keys. Software: Them plastic eatin' utensils. Mouse: Whats eats the horses grain. Main Frame: Hold up the barn roof. Port: Fancy wine. Enter: C'mon in. Random Access Memory: You can't remember whatcha' paid for that new rifle when your wife asks. star me if u like

Cowboy replied: "LOL, enjoyed it thoroughly, thanks"

Brainz replied: "Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Oi laffed me freakin' ed off!!!."

Raj replied: "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA"

fan of dan replied: "hahhahahahahahah really clever!! hahhaahhahahahahahahahahahhahahaaaa"

Kanwar J D replied: "Hard Drive: Getting' home in the winter season. Enter: C'mon in. heeeeeeeeeeeeee."

emina!!!!! replied: "haha cool"

BF replied: "good good."

MaximDude replied: "Well done"

hotkagome replied: "thank you for the lol moment"

Have you ever laughed at these before? Hick computer terms Redneck computer terms Log On: Makin' the wood stove hotter. Log Off: Don't add no wood. Monitor: Keepin' an eye on the wood stove. Download: Gettin' the firewood off the pickup. Mega Hertz: When yer not careful down loadin'. Floppy Disk: Whatcha git from pilin' too much firewood. Ram: The hydrolic thingy that splits the firewood. Hard Drive: Getting' home in the winter season. Prompt: What you wish the mail was in the winter. Windows: What to shut when it's below 15 below. Screen: What 'cha need for the black fly season. Byte: That's what the flies do. Chip: What to munch on. Micro Chip: What's left in the bottom of the bag. Infrared: Where the left-overs go when Fred's around. Modem: What 'cha did to the hay fields. Dot Matrix: Farmer Matrix's wife. Lap Top: Where little kids feel comfy. Keyboard: Where ya hang your keys. Software: Them plastic eatin' utensils. Mouse: Whats eats the horses grain. Main Frame: Hold up the barn roof. Port: Fancy wine. Enter: C'mon in. Random Access Memory: You can't remember whatcha' paid for that new rifle when your wife asks.

Southern At Heart replied: "Lol"

` replied: "ROFL!!. my favourite was " Mega Hertz: When yer not careful down loadin'. " .. hahaha"

ozzie s replied: "I knowed a Dot Matrix"

@: replied: "no"

Judie(((ST JUDE KIDS))) replied: "Talk about ROFL,you are going to have to stop this Camille before I hurt myself.These were so funny.Thanks for another good laugh,I needed it.Keep them coming."

iam try to buy 2003 acura tl from NJ ? hello every one can you please help out people for the car i will shuw your the carfax history what your think about this car please is there any problem it soud wear it register from 2003 to 2004 from 2004 to 2008 with another 4 years please check out and let meknow The number of owners is estimated by CARFAX Year purchased 2003 2008 Type of owner Personal --- Estimated length of ownership 4 yrs. 7 mo. 1 month Owned in the following states/provinces New Jersey New Jersey Estimated miles driven per year 21,170/yr --- Last reported odometer reading 99,848 100,868 CARFAX guarantees the information in this section Salvage | Junk | Rebuilt Guaranteed No Problem Guaranteed No Problem Fire/Flood | Hail Damage | Buyback/Lemon Guaranteed No Problem Guaranteed No Problem Not Actual Mileage | Exceeds Mechanical Limits Guaranteed No Problem Guaranteed No Problem GUARANTEED - None of these major title problems were reported by a state Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). If you find that any of these title problems were reported by a DMV and not included in this report, CARFAX will buy this vehicle back. Register | View Terms Not all accidents or other issues are reported to CARFAX Total Loss Check No total loss reported to CARFAX. No Issues Reported No Issues Reported Structural / Frame Damage Check No structural / frame damage reported to CARFAX. No Issues Reported No Issues Reported Airbag Deployment Check No airbag deployment reported to CARFAX. No Issues Reported No Issues Reported Odometer Rollback Check No indication of an odometer rollback. No Issues Indicated No Issues Indicated Accident / Damage Check No accidents or damage reported to CARFAX. No Issues Reported No Issues Reported Manufacturer Recall Check Check with an authorized Acura dealer for any open recalls. No Recalls Reported No Recalls Reported Basic Warranty Check Original warranty estimated to have expired. View Info Interested in an extended warranty? Warranty Expired Warranty Expired Tell us what you know about this vehicle Still looking? Find similar cars just listed for sale in your area. Let us do the work! Get daily updates of ACURA TL vehicles for sale in your area. Email: Zip: 2003 ACURA 3.2 TL Body Style: Sedan 4 DR Engine Type: 3.2L V6 PFI SOHC 24V Standard Equipment: Power Windows, Power Steering, Air Conditioning, AM / FM CD, Power Brakes, Power sun / moon roof, Tilt Wheel, 6-digit Odometer Free CARFAX Report Smithtown Toyota 631-724-3300 Distance: 49.41 mi View Dealer Inventory Contact Dealer 2002 ACURA 3.2 TL Body Style: Sedan 4 DR Engine Type: 3.2L V6 PFI SOHC 24V Standard Equipment: Power Windows, Power Steering, Air Conditioning, AM / FM CD, Power Brakes, Power sun / moon roof, Tilt Wheel, 6-digit Odometer Free CARFAX Report Curry Ford Subaru 914-736-1300 Distance: 45.33 mi View Dealer Inventory Contact Dealer 2003 ACURA 3.2 TL TYPE-S Body Style: Sedan 4 DR Engine Type: 3.2L V6 PFI SOHC 24V Standard Equipment: Power Windows, Power Steering, Air Conditioning, AM / FM Cassette, Power Brakes, Power sun / moon roof, Tilt Wheel, 6-digit Odometer Free CARFAX Report Napoli Suzuki Indoor Auto Outlet 1-888-776-8853 Distance: 22.53 mi View Dealer Inventory Contact Dealer A CARFAX Vehicle History Report is based only on information supplied to CARFAX. CARFAX checked over 5 billion vehicle history events and found 5 record(s) for this 2003 ACURA 3.2 TL TYPE-S (19UUA56873A085539). Purchased: 2003 Type: Personal Where: New Jersey Est. miles/year: 21,170/yr Est. length owned: 7/15/03 - 3/14/08 (4 yrs. 7 mo.) Date: Mileage: Source: Comments: 07/15/2003 4 New Jersey Motor Vehicle Dept. Middletown, NJ Title #RV20032180393 Title issued or updated First owner reported Registered as personal vehicle 04/06/2004 18,281 Inspection Co. New Jersey Vehicle inspected Anti-theft device present at the time of inspection 03/14/2008 99,848 Dealer Inventory Hazlet, NJ Vehicle offered for sale 03/26/2008 New Jersey Motor Vehicle Dept. Hazlet, NJ Title #MA20080860043 Title issued or updated Dealer took title of this vehicle while it was in inventory Purchased: 2008 Where: New Jersey Est. miles/year: --- Est. length owned: 8/18/08 - present (1 month) Date: Mileage: Source: Comments: 08/18/2008 100,868 New Jersey Motor Vehicle Dept. Willingboro, NJ Title #GD20082310759 Title issued or updated New ow

Stupid Flanders replied: "I dont understand your question."

How did World Trade Center building 7 fall on 9/11? Hi! I have just now gotten back from the Greenwood Library {in Seattle} from a showing of parts of videos about the 911 conspiracy -- a sort of compilation of clips from different videos by different people. Before today, I was skeptical -- I would have gone so far as to say that Bush & co. KNEW something in advance, and decided it was in their best interest to DO NOTHING -- that's as far as I thot it reasonable to go. NOW, however, after viewing those clips -- especially of No. 7 going down -- we have all seen, over & over, clips in the news of hi-rises going down, it's always fun to watch -- and building 7 went down EXACTLY the same way, you could see it in all the clips, over & over, from all different angles. There was NO debris on the roof; and the fires burning were such as SHOULD have been able to have been put out by sprinklers. Furthermore, one of the people involved SAID that "they had decided to PULL the building" -- THAT IS A TECHNICAL TERM USED BY DEMOLITION PEOPLE AND IT MEANS "TO DEMOLISH"! This was after the investigation started. It was NOT, of course, picked up by any of the news media. You & I never heard that, did we? It's sensational! a confession! BUT, wait -- there's more! In order for a building to go down in the neat manner we have all seen in numerous news clips of numerous buildings, IT TAKES EXPERTS DOING DAYS, MAYBE WEEKS OF CAREFUL WORK TO PLACE THE EXPLOSIVES JUST EXACTLY RIGHT, etc.etc. If No. 7 went down just hours after the twin towers -- THAT MEANS THE EXPLOSIVES WERE ALREADY IN PLACE DAYS BEFORE THE EVENT!!!!!!! You can imagine what THAT implies! They can't just run in there, set a few explosive charges in a couple of hours, and have the building go down in that neat, very professional way!!!!! There is evidence that one of the entire floors of that building was used as a "command center" -- it, only one floor, was bomb-proofed, HAD ITS OWN AIR SUPPLY and its own water supply, and had glass installed that was able to withstand 160-mile-an-hour winds. Only one floor. That had a good view of the other twin towers. There are in existence the records of this work being done and paid for. The idea was, that this building, no. 7, was used to "command" maybe drone airplanes? or supervise the whole thing anyway, and THAT WAS WHY BUILDING 7 HAD TO BE DESTROYED -- TO DESTROY INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE ! NO STEEL-FRAMED BUILDING IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE HAS EVER GONE DOWN FROM A FIRE!!!!!! That is impossible. Never happened before, never will happen. If it WERE possible, every office worker and hi-rise apartment dweller ought to be concerned!

HarryMay replied: "godzilla stepped on it.."

Look it up replied: "Like it was planned to fall, into it's basement."

kris13iam replied: "It was pulled - like the other two..."

shermynewstart replied: "Have you seen the video,,,"Loose change?""

Sean X replied: "Well on the conspiracy videos I watched they didn't show how much damage there was to the building and how bad the fire was in it. I seen the pics of how badly damaged it was on some sites and on a programme called conspiracy files and it was a lot worse than they showed in any of the conspiracy videos I had seen."

infobrokernate replied: "Steel loses it's temper when it is under constant heat like burning jet fuel."

wolf replied: "You have too much time on your hands. Perhaps you should get a job and let the Conspiracy Freaks make up the silly conspiracies. No one pays any attention to these lies anymore, except some school kids and nuts."

critter man replied: "http://WWW.911Weknow.com. you should find it relevant"

slits_throats replied: "Its obvious that the government did it. its shameful how lazy cowardly and worthless the american public is to not do anything about it"

Ide fixxe replied: "I'll keep this short, lol. The weight from the jet liners caused the structures to collapse. Those high risers were not designed to hold a mega ton air ship."

VoodooPunk replied: "Look outside. See the people in the white coats? They're coming for you. The towers fell because nutjob Muslims flew two passenger planes into them. Seriously, how gullible must a person be to believe these cornball conspiracies?"

Tom B replied: "Yes they did it, the feds did it.they blew them up.controlled demolition.they got those people off those planes and or now cremated.Yes it was military drones which went into those buildings.The future will be worst.when they do another one,declare Marshall law.fill the concentration camps with true Americans and declare war on the country they PICK to be the one they wish to attack to start the war of civilizations.they will; then draft out young.to fight the war . may God help us all.may my beloved South land leave the Union again and make it stick this time.many millions of Americans want another investigation, so why isn't it being looked into? because our leaders most ALL or controlled by a hidden power Elite."

united9198 replied: "You might be surprised to find out that the world is in fact not flat as it looks even from the highest building. The problem with your "evidence" is that there is no evidence of any kind to support the wild concept that the President of the United States would kill a bunch of people just to get us into a war. Even if that were arguable, I don't see how anyone with a rational thought in their head could on one hand call President Bush a dunce and on the other hand accuse him of masterminding the most outstanding operation ever to hit the planet earth. Not only would he have to involve hundreds if not thousands of other people in his scheme, but he would somehow have had the ability to keep this quiet for six years. It is astounding to suggest that he could pull this off even if he wanted to. Where are the people who were killed at the WTC? Where are the people who boarded the airplanes? Why didn't anyone in New York notice that someone was installing explosives in the WTC? Your theory just does not hold any water despite the number of "conclusive" videos that "prove" that it happened. Surely no one can hate Bush enough to suggest that he would do such a thing."

mystery g replied: "It was controlled demolition. Don't believe the "Official" 911 report."

JoeyNyne replied: "There were many causes for the failure of the two towers: 1. The planes that crashed into the towers were nearly filled with fuel. 2. The fire retardant that was used in the buildings was the spray on type not nearly as effective as rigid fire rated material, but much cheaper. 3. The fires in the towers were above 2000 degrees F. This makes the steel soft. 4. The heat caused the air in the buildings to expand pushing outward against the buildings columns. 5. The soft columns began to bow. This changed the loading on the columns for which the columns were not designed for. 6. All of the above worked together causing the buildings to pancake - one floor could not hold the floor above it and it collapsed, causing the next floor to collapse and so on. The City Engineer should have ordered everyone out of the buildings after the second crash."

Dilbert replied: "Browsing the answers, I noticed this one: "Steel loses it's temper when it is under constant heat like burning jet fuel." I'm wondering what happens when it loses its temper. Does it get hot under the collar? But seriously, one thing to take into account is that the attacks were carefully planned by educated Al Queda people who understood the engineering of the buildings. They knew above a certain temperature the buildings would crush themselves downwards. On the floor with the most heat from the fire, the welds in the vertical beams come loose, and that floor collapses. The whole top of the building falls down one floor when a middle floor collapses. That's a huge amount of heavy metal falling 10 feet. Have you ever seen a piece of metal fall 10 feet? It hits so hard it can do serious damage. The top half of the building was such a heavy piece of metal, when it hit the floor below, it broke it loose from its welds, and the whole building kept falling like that, one floor at a time. A rapid cascading collapse. Sort of like dominoes, but straight downward. You need not be concerned that such a thing could be caused by an ordinary fire. This fire was far hotter than any ordinary fire ever gets. A whole jumbo airliner with enough fuel to fly thousands of miles. That fuel burns extremely hot. Such a thing would not be possible in an ordinary fire. There would be no place that much fuel could come from. Ordinary fires are caused by wood burning, etc., which is a breeze compared to that much jet fuel burning."

lghs replied: "I implore you to forget about events at the World Trade Centre and at the Pentagon for a while and go back to the airports on the morning of 9/11, thats where you will find the smoking gun. There is not a shred of evidence placing the nineteen (19) alleged hijackers at any of the three (3) airports on the morning of 9/11/2001. RE-OPEN THE 9/11 INVESTIGATION NOW AND LETS PUT THE REAL MURDERERS IN GUANTANAMO FOR LIFE. Illuminati/Zionist Neocons Israelis - Mossad "

gimpalomg replied: "With all due respect I ain't buying it. Have you ever heard of Richard Nixon? He was the only President of the United States to resign from office. He was part of a conspiracy to cover-up a burglary where no one was hurt. That conspiracy was comprised of about eight people and he was unable to keep it under wraps. His crimes were technically and legally the same as President Clinton's attempt to cover-up the Monica situation, it was obstruction of justice. Only Nixon didn't commit perjury. The press went after Nixon like a bunch of jackals. They applied pressure until he was forced out of office. Now a conspiracy like you suggest would require at least hundreds of people be involved. And, while Clinton was a democrat and immune from media investigation Bush is a Republican and the target of same. I can't imagine a Presidential conspiracy comprising hundreds of people and costing thousands of lives would go undetected, especially since conspiracies fall apart from inside. Someone has to brag about it and that spells the end. The towers came down, let's say they were imploded, why was it necessary to crash a commercial airliner into a field in Pennsylvania. No I'm sorry, I have seen the photos and clips too, including the one with the face of a man in the smoke cloud. The guy who did that can get a job in Hollywood any time he wants it. Just as I can manipulate the serial number on a dollar bill to get the number 666 a conspiracy theorist can pick two or three anomalies out of a situation and spin a whole web of intrigue out of it. The no moon landing has been debunked and at first sight it was convincing to me and a lot of others. And about no fire damaging a steel building, the heII it hasnt I was there and there was NO jet fuel involved. When I investigated aircraft accidents I have seen many pieces of steel deformed by fuel fires. The information you are basing that comment on is just incorrect. When a person believes that is the end of it, their facts are set. Remember the concept that simple is probably right. Weeks of setting charges under the noses of 100,000 people then killing thousands of them. Believe what you will but I think your wrong Cheers, and have a good day."

TexasRose replied: "It's truly comical how some people get on here and try to spout stuff without even knowing the facts. Steel does NOT burn at 750 degrees...the temp. of jet fuel...without an excellerant. There were rolling black out at the WTC towers at least 3 weeks leading up to 9-11. That is where thermite was installed. Most of the jet fuel went up and out of the second tower. Falling concrete does NOT turn into powder...without help. Do you research people...those planes did NOT bring the towers down. Rumsfeld even admitted..on tape(video) that flight 93 was SHOT DOWN. You are nothing more than sheeple if you continue to believe the government's side of that day. "You can fool some of the people all the time, those are the ones we are concentrating on." George Bush. Even HE knows he has you fooled!"

Wouldn't you rather be suspicious and wrong than complacent and wrong? I know, I know, only tin-foil-hat types could harbor suspicions that our political class is capable of "malfeasance"... Senator Max Cleland - Former member of the 9/11 Commission, resigned in December 2003: "I, as a member of the [9/11] Commission, cannot look any American in the eye... It is a national scandal... this White House wants to cover [9/11] up." Senator Mark Dayton - Member, Senate Committee on Armed Services and Homeland Security: "[NORAD] lied to the American people, they lied to Congress and they lied to your 9/11 Commission.. .the most gross incompetence and dereliction of responsibility and negligence" Congressman Ron Paul - Vice Chairman of the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee: The [9/11] investigations that have been done so far are more or less cover-up and no real explanation" Congressman Curt Weldon: "[9/11 Commission] there's something very sinister going on here... something desperately wrong... This involved what is right now the covering up of information that led to the deaths of 3,000 people" Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney - Member of the House Armed Services Committee: The [9/11] Commission ran up against obstruction by the administration and non-cooperation from government agencies... the errors and omissions immediately jumped out at us" Director of the FBI, Louis Freeh: "[9/11 Commission findings] raise serious challenges to the commission's credibility and, if the facts prove out, might just render the commission historically insignificant itself" Former Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, Paul Craig Roberts, PhD: "Distinguished national and international scientists and scholars present massive evidence that the 9/11 Commission Report is a hoax and that the 9/11 "terrorist attack" has been manipulated to serve a hegemonic agenda in the Middle East... We know that it is strictly impossible for any building, much less steel columned buildings, to "pancake" at free fall speed. Therefore, it is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the collapse of the WTC buildings is false" Assistant Secretary of Housing, Catherine Austin Fitts: "The official story could not possibly have happened... Its not possible. Its not operationally feasible... The Commission was a whitewash." U.S. Army Intelligence officer, Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice, John Loftus: "The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defense of incompetence" Foreign Service Officer, George Kenney: "I cannot believe, much as I might like to, the standard account of 9/11" Foreign Service Officer, J. Michael Springman: "Fifteen of the nineteen people who allegedly flew airplanes into buildings in the United States got their visas from the same CIA Consulate at Jeddah" Deputy Attorney General, State of Pennsylvania, Philip J. Berg, Esquire: "The official story of what actually took place on 9/11 is a lie. " Major General U.S. Army, Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, Albert Stubblebine [his specialty analyzing satellite photos]: "I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, The plane does not fit in that hole. So what did hit the Pentagon? Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Deputy Director of Field Operations for the U.S. Marine Corps Historical Center: "I'm astounded that the conspiracy theory advanced by the administration could in fact be true and the evidence does not seem to suggest that's accurate." Col. Robert Bowman, U.S. Air Force, Director of Advanced Space Programs, PhD Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering: "The official 9/11 story is impossible .. There is a cover up... high levels of our government don't want us to know what happened... highly placed individuals in the administration. ..Dick Cheney...the very kindest thing we can say about George W Bush...is high treason and conspiracy to commit murder." Col. George Nelson, U.S. Air Force, aircraft accident investigator: "I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident... The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from view .. with all the evidence readilty available at the pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged .. the most heinous conspiracy in outr country's history." Major Douglas Rokke, PhD, U.S. Army: [Regarding the impact at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001] "When you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile." Capt. Russ Wittenberg, U.S. Air Force, fighter pilot, commercial pilot flying 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777s. Had previously flown Flight 93, which impacted in Pennsylvania, and Flight 175, the second plane to hit the WTC: "The government story they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S. plain and simple...[Regarding Flight 77]"The airplane could not have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into what they call a high speed stall. The airplane won't go that fast if you start pulling those high G maneuvers at those bank angles... The vehicle that hit the Pentagon was not Flight 77" Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force, Office of the Secretary of Defense, staff of the Director of the National Security Agency: "It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics...There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked Pentagon, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage one would expect from the impact of a large airliner... this visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the Sec of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a ' missile ' ... I saw nothing of significance at the point of contact ~ no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon .. all of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected was not evident .. the same is true with regard to the damage we expected .. but I did not see this kind of damage. Rather, the facade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this facade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 0r 40 minutes, with the roof remaining relatively straight .. The scene, in short, was not what I would have expected from a strike by a large jetliner. It was, however, exactly what one would have expected if a missile had struck the Pentagon " Senior Military Affairs Journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School, Barbara Honegger, MS: "The US military, not al Qaeda, had the sustained access weeks before 9/11 to also plant controlled demolition charges throughout the superstructures of WTC 1 and WTC 2, and in WTC 7, which brought down all three buildings on 9/11...A US military plane, not one piloted by al Qaeda, performed the highly skilled, high-speed 270-degree dive towards the Pentagon that Air Traffic Controllers on 9/11 were sure was a military plane as they watched it on their screens. Only a military aircraft, not a civilian plane flown by al Qaeda, would have given off the "Friendly" signal needed to disable the Pentagon's anti-aircraft missile batteries as it approached the building...Only the US military, not al Qaeda, had the ability to break all of its Standard Operating Procedures to paralyze its own emergency response system" Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD, U.S. Army, U.S. Army Intelligence Officer: "I knew from September 18, 2001, that the official story about 9/11 was false. ... [A]nomalies poured in rapidly: the hijackers' names appearing in none of the published flight passenger lists, BBC reports of stolen identities of the alleged hijackers or the alleged hijackers being found alive, the obvious demolitions of WTC 1 and 2...and WTC7...not hit by an airplane...the lack of identifiable Boeing 757 wreckage at the Pentagon" Capt. Eric H. May, U.S. Army, Intelligence officer: "I view the 911 event ...as a matter that implies either...A) passive participation by the Bush White House through a deliberate stand-down or B) active execution of a plot by rogue elements of government, starting with the White House itself, in creating a spectacle of destruction that would lead the United States into an invasion of the Middle East" Former Chairman, National Intelligence Estimates, CIA, responsible for preparing the Presidents Daily Brief, U.S. Army Intelligence Officer, Raymond L. McGovern: "I think at simplest terms, there's a cover-up. The 9/11 report is a joke...just as Hitler in 1933 cynically exploited the burning of the parliament building, the Reichstag, this is exactly what our President did in exploiting 9/11...making a war of aggression on a country that he knew had nothing to do with 9/11...that' s certainly an impeachable offense...But compelling evidence for an even more disturbing conclusion: that the 9/11 attacks were themselves orchestrated by this administration precisely so they could be thus exploited." National Intelligence Officer and Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis, William Christison: "There is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. An airliner almost certainly did not hit The Pentagon. The North and South Towers of the World Trade Center almost certainly did not collapse and fall to earth because hijacked aircraft hit them...this all was totally an inside job. I have since decided that... at least some elements in this US government had contributed in some way or other to causing 9/11 to happen or at least allowing it to happen... The reason that the two towers in New York actually collapsed and fell all the way to the ground was controlled explosions rather than just being hit by two airplanes. All of the characteristics of these demolitions show that they almost had to have been controlled explosions.. . I think you almost have to look at the 9/11 Commission Report as a joke and not a serious piece of analysis at all... It's a monstrous crime." U.S. Marine Corps intelligence officer, case officer CIA. Robert David Steele: "I am forced to conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indict (not necessarily convict) Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and others...This is, without question, the most important modern reference on state-sponsored terrorism, and also the reference that most pointedly suggests that select rogue elements within the US Government, most likely led by Dick Cheney with the assistance of George Tenet, Buzzy Kronguard, and others close to the Wall Street gangs, are the most guilty of state-sponsored terrorism... I'm absolutely certain that WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition and that as far as I'm concerned means that this case has not been properly investigated. There's no way that building could have come down without controlled demolition." CIA Case Officer, Specialist in the Middle East, Directorate of Operations, Awarded Career Intelligence Medal, Robert Baer: [Regarding the opinion there was an aspect of 'inside job' to 9/11 within the U.S. Government], "There is that possibility, the evidence points at it." Counter-terrorism expert in the Security Division of the federal Aviation Administration. Team leader of the FAA's Red (Terrorism) Team in the Federal Air Marshall program, Coast Guard officer, Bogdan Dzakovic: "At worst, I think the 9/11 Commission Report is treasonous." Minister of Justice, West Germany, Horst Ehmke, PhD: "Terrorists could not have carried out such an operation with four hijacked planes without the support of a secret service." State Secretary, Federal Ministry of Defense, West Germany, Andreas von Buelow, PhD: "The official story is so inadequate and far-fetched that there must be another one...This is unthinkable, without years-long support from secret apparatuses of the state and industry." President of Italy, Francesco Cossiga: "[9/11] could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel." General Leonid Ivashov, Chief of Staff, Russian armed forces, Ministry of Defense: "Only secret services and their current chiefs or those retired but still having influence inside the state organizations have the ability to plan, organize and conduct an operation [9/11] of such magnitude... Osama bin Laden and "Al Qaeda" cannot be the organizers nor the performers of the September 11 attacks. They do not have the necessary organization, resources or leaders." Foreign Minister of Egypt, Mohamed Hassanein Heikal: "Bin Laden does not have the capabilities for an operation [9/11] of this magnitude. When I hear Bush talking about al-Qaida as if it was Nazi Germany or the communist party of the Soviet Union, I laugh because I know what is there. Bin Laden has been under surveillance for years: every telephone call was monitored and al-Qaida has been penetrated by American intelligence, Pakistani intelligence, Saudi intelligence, Egyptian intelligence. They could not have kept secret an operation that required such a degree of organisation and sophistication. " Chief of Staff, Pakistani Army, General Mirza Aslam Beg: "The information which is now coming up, goes to prove that involvement by the "rogue elements" of the U.S. military and intelligence organization is getting more obvious. Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda definitely do not have the knowhow and the capability to launch such operations involving such high precision coordination, based on information and expertise." European Parliament, Committee on Security and Defense, Giulietto Chiesa: "Billions of people were given only one explanation. ...which is entirely false....everyone who dares to question it is treated as if he was a fool." French Army Intelligence and artillery officer, Col. Pierre-Henri Bunel, Expert in the effects of artillery weapons and explosives: "Image of the impact on the Pentagon is very instructive as to the nature of the explosion. ... It corresponds to a detonation of an explosive with high energetic power. The explosion does not correspond to a deflagration of kerosene...suggests a single engine flying vehicle much smaller in size than an airliner...resemble s the effects of anti-concrete hollow charges that I have been able to observe on a number of battlefields. ..lead me therefore to think that the detonation that struck the building was that of a high-powered hollow charge used to destroy hardened buildings and carried by an aerial vehicle, a missile." Safety Engineer and accident Analyst, National Safety Technology Authority, Finland, Heikki Kurttila, PhD: "Conclusion: The observed collapse time of WTC 7 was 6.5 seconds. That is only half a second longer than it would have taken for the top of the building to fall to the ground in a vacuum, and half a second shorter than the falling time of an apple when air resistance is taken into account. ... The great speed of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition." Counter-Terrorism Officer, MI5 (Britain), David Shayler: "The available evidence indicates that people in key positions in the FBI, the State Department, the CIA and so on were not loyal to the Constitution; that they saw an opportunity in plans laid down by genuine Islamic terrorists to carry out an operation that would shock the world and would therefore justify U.S. adventurism in the middle East, particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq." Chairman, 9/11 Commission, Thomas H. Kean, Former Governor of New Jersey: "FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue...We, to this day, don't know why NORAD told us what they told us...It was just so far from the truth." Vice Chairman, 9/11 Commission, Lee Hamilton, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Homeland Security Advisory Council: "We got started late; we had a very short time frame...we did not have enough money...We had a lot of people strongly opposed to what we did. We had a lot of trouble getting access to documents and to people. ... So there were all kinds of reasons we thought we were set up to fail." 9/11 Commissioner, Timothy J. Roemer, PhD, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence: "That panel members so distrusted testimony from Pentagon officials that they referred their concerns to the Pentagon's inspector general...We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting." Senior Counsel, 9/11 Commission, John J. Farmer, Jr., Former Attorney General, NJ, Former Commissioner of the State Commission of Investigations: [Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public] - "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described... The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years." "Taxes are not raised to carry on wars, wars are raised to ca

pegasus replied: "neither one."

Robert K replied: "I'll be honest. I didn't read all of those long, long charges. I did read the first few from the Senators and such. They sounded like people who were skeptical of the 911 commission's report, but there was nothing there to indicate that they actually believed it was an inside job. Then I skimmed throug the later stuff that pointed the finger much more directly at the administration. The problem was, that I didn't recognize these people. If these people are actually credible, then I must conclude that the world is insane. But I must resist that to the last. so I have to fall back on the other possibility; that you are quoting liars. maybe I ought to be a bit more clear; I'm not saying that I think the people quoted are liars. I suspect, though, that the people who say they said these things are."

rz1971 replied: "To be honest, if both are wrong then: Don't worry, be happy!"

i want to build a second floor on my parents house using cad? ok well before you start telling me, you dont know what your getting youself into, i have no problem inversting time into this, i am good with computers, programs and drawing stuff. I have done windows, roofs, built an entire garage, electrical, insulation, drywall. I may not know technical terms for building, but I know where I need to make things strong and stuff like that. I know I need to also check for structural damage, and strength. Its basicly going to have 3 extra rooms ontop, each with its own closet. Of course electrical outlets I know have codes, so i will research this when i am closer to starting this project. i went to my city hall, and asked what i needed for the permit, they said blueprints of old construction, and new construction. So i hope CAD can produce this for me. He didnt say if he needed an engineer anything like that. But i did replace the windows this summer and all i did was etched my old window frame look, and etched a new frame with new window and he accepted it. He said it was unnesessary to come by check, and I got the permit.(my first permit ever) so, besides the studying CAD books, and a class or two(or HOW MANY DO I NEED). I guess the best question to this is, how would be the best way to get going on this, Id like to save money, and I can do drawing, design and stuff. Is there like a rent-a-engineer website or place where I can just take my blueprints to get checked and be charged less? For construction, I really do believe I can do this, I got people that can help me build. I mean with CAD it pretty much tells me what, how, where to do what doesnt it? My influence, about 7 years ago my front door neighbor(a retired engineer) Built his own second floor, I helped him, and it didnt seem to hard at all, he had permit and everything, of course he did most of the brain work, but it didnt seem like anything out of this world. He is now gone, so I cant ask him for help, so im turning to yahoo, and just well asking for getting pointers and some answers. Overall question, can I do this?? How much would I save?? Can I take my blueprints and have them checked?? Labor wont be a problem, I am patient and good at working, and I get summers off since I am a student. And id be able to get some help from friends.

Jim replied: "Go ahead and make your plans, and submit them when you apply for your permit. If anything is not up to your local building codes, your local authorities will revise them for you. It's what they do."

Please Help Me: I need some idea's on how to organize in Power Point With some nice Pictures? I need help on finding gooe pictures for each of my ideas posted here; perhaps i can help you with something? i am in South Korea; just ask. I am doing a Power Point Presentation on Protect the Enviroment; and i have the following ideas; however i could use great help on pictures for each idea. Please help me? To Stop Global Warming (Protect our Environment) 1. Replace a regular incandescent light bulb with a compact fluorescent light bulb (cfl) CFLs use 60% less energy than a regular bulb. This simple switch will save about 300 pounds of carbon dioxide a year. 2. Install a programmable thermostat Programmable thermostats will automatically lower the heat or air conditioning at night and raise them again in the morning. They can save you $100 a year on your energy bill. 3. Move your thermostat down 2 in winter and up 2 in summer Almost half of the energy we use in our homes goes to heating and cooling. You could save about 2,000 pounds of carbon dioxide a year with this simple adjustment. The American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy has more tips for saving energy on heating and cooling. 4. Clean or replace filters on your furnace and air conditioner Cleaning a dirty air filter can save 350 pounds of carbon dioxide a year. 5. Choose energy efficient appliances when making new purchases Look for the Energy Star label on new appliances to choose the most efficient models available. 6. Do not leave appliances on standby Use the "on/off" function on the machine itself. A TV set that's switched on for 3 hours a day (the average time Europeans spend watching TV) and in standby mode during the remaining 21 hours uses about 40% of its energy in standby mode. 7. Wrap your water heater in an insulation blanket You'll save 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide a year with this simple action. You can save another 550 pounds per year by setting the thermostat no higher than 50C. 8. Move your fridge and freezer Placing them next to the cooker or boiler consumes much more energy than if they were standing on their own. For example, if you put them in a hot cellar room where the room temperature is 30-35C, energy use is almost double and causes an extra 160kg of CO2 emissions for fridges per year and 320kg for freezers. 9. Defrost old fridges and freezers regularly Even better is to replace them with newer models, which all have automatic defrost cycles and are generally up to two times more energy-efficient than their predecessors. 10. Don't let heat escape from your house over a long period When airing your house, open the windows for only a few minutes. If you leave a small opening all day long, the energy needed to keep it warm inside during six cold months (10C or less outside temperature) would result in almost 1 ton of CO2 emissions. 11. Replace your old single-glazed windows with double-glazing This requires a bit of upfront investment, but will halve the energy lost through windows and pay off in the long term. If you go for the best the market has to offer (wooden-framed double-glazed units with low-emission glass and filled with argon gas), you can even save more than 70% of the energy lost. 12. Get a home energy audit Many utilities offer free home energy audits to find where your home is poorly insulated or energy inefficient. You can save up to 30% off your energy bill and 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide a year. Energy Star can help you find an energy specialist. 13. Cover your pots while cooking Doing so can save a lot of the energy needed for preparing the dish. Even better are pressure cookers and steamers: they can save around 70%! 14. Use the washing machine or dishwasher only when they are full If you need to use it when it is half full, then use the half-load or economy setting. There is also no need to set the temperatures high. Nowadays detergents are so efficient that they get your clothes and dishes clean at low temperatures. 15. Take a shower instead of a bath A shower takes up to four times less energy than a bath. To maximise the energy saving, avoid power showers and use low-flow showerheads, which are cheap and provide the same comfort. 16. Use less hot water It takes a lot of energy to heat water. You can use less hot water by installing a low flow showerhead (350 pounds of carbon dioxide saved per year) and washing your clothes in cold or warm water (500 pounds saved per year) instead of hot. 17. Use a clothesline instead of a dryer whenever possible You can save 700 pounds of carbon dioxide when you air dry your clothes for 6 months out of the year. 18. Insulate and weatherize your home Properly insulating your walls and ceilings can save 25% of your home heating bill and 2,000 pounds of carbon dioxide a year. Caulking and weather-stripping can save another 1,700 pounds per year. Energy Efficient has more information on how to better insulate your home. 19. Be sure you're recycling at home You can save 2,400 pounds of carbon dioxide a year by recycling half of the waste your household generates. Earth 911 can help you find recycling resources in your area. 20. Recycle your organic waste Around 3% of the greenhouse gas emissions through the methane is released by decomposing bio-degradable waste. By recycling organic waste or composting it if you have a garden, you can help eliminate this problem! Just make sure that you compost it properly, so it decomposes with sufficient oxygen, otherwise your compost will cause methane emissions and smell foul. 21. Buy intelligently One bottle of 1.5l requires less energy and produces less waste than three bottles of 0.5l. As well, buy recycled paper products: it takes less 70 to 90% less energy to make recycled paper and it prevents the loss of forests worldwide. 22. Choose products that come with little packaging and buy refills when you can You will also cut down on waste production and energy use! 23. Reuse your shopping bag When shopping, it saves energy and waste to use a reusable bag instead of accepting a disposable one in each shop. Waste not only discharges CO2 and methane into the atmosphere, it can also pollute the air, groundwater and soil. 24. Reduce waste Most products we buy cause greenhouse gas emissions in one or another way, e.g. during production and distribution. By taking your lunch in a reusable lunch box instead of a disposable one, you save the energy needed to produce new lunch boxes. 25. Plant a tree A single tree will absorb one ton of carbon dioxide over its lifetime. Shade provided by trees can also reduce your air conditioning bill by 10 to 15%. The Arbor Day Foundation has information on planting and provides trees you can plant with membership. 26. Switch to green power In many areas, you can switch to energy generated by clean, renewable sources such as wind and solar. The Green Power Network is a good place to start to figure out what's available in your area. 27. Buy locally grown and produced foods The average meal in the United States travels 1,200 miles from the farm to your plate. Buying locally will save fuel and keep money in your community. 28. Buy fresh foods instead of frozen Frozen food uses 10 times more energy to produce. 29. Seek out and support local farmers markets They reduce the amount of energy required to grow and transport the food to you by one fifth. You can find a farmer's market in your area at the USDA website. 30. Buy organic foods as much as possible Organic soils capture and store carbon dioxide at much higher levels than soils from conventional farms. If we grew all of our corn and soybeans organically, we'd remove 580 billion pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere! 31. Eat less meat Methane is the second most significant greenhouse gas and cows are one of the greatest methane emitters. Their grassy diet and multiple stomachs cause them to produce methane, which they exhale with every breath. 32. Reduce the number of miles you drive by walking, biking, carpooling or taking mass transit wherever possible Avoiding just 10 miles of driving every week would eliminate about 500 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions a year! Look for transit options in your area. 33. Start a carpool with your coworkers or classmates Sharing a ride with someone just 2 days a week will reduce your carbon dioxide emissions by 1,590 pounds a year. eRideShare.com runs a free national service connecting commuters and travelers. 34. Don't leave an empty roof rack on your car This can increase fuel consumption and CO2 emissions by up to 10% due to wind resistance and the extra weight - removing it is a better idea. 35. Keep your car tuned up Regular maintenance helps improve fuel efficiency and reduces emissions. When just 1% of car owners properly maintain their cars, nearly a billion pounds of carbon dioxide are kept out of the atmosphere. 36. Drive carefully and do not waste fuel You can reduce CO2 emissions by readjusting your driving style. Choose proper gears, do not abuse the gas pedal, use the engine brake instead of the pedal brake when possible and turn off your engine when your vehicle is motionless for more than one minute. By readjusting your driving style you can save money on both fuel and car mantainance. 37. Check your tires weekly to make sure they're properly inflated Proper inflation can improve gas mileage by more than 3%. Since every gallon of gasoline saved keeps 20 pounds of carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, every increase in fuel efficiency makes a difference! 38. When it is time for a new car, choose a more fuel efficient vehicle You can save 3,000 pounds of carbon dioxide every year if your new car gets only 3 miles per gallon more than your current one. You can get up to 60 miles per gallon with a hybrid! You can find information on fuel efficiency on FuelEconomy and on GreenCars websites. 39. Try car sharing Need a car but don't want to buy one? Community car sharing organizations provide access to a car and your membership fee covers gas, maintenance and insurance. Many companies - such as Flexcar - offer low emission or hybrid cars too! Also, see ZipCar. 40. Try telecommuting from home Telecommuting can help you drastically reduce the number of miles you drive every week. For more information, check out the Telework Coalition. 41. Fly less Air travel produces large amounts of emissions so reducing how much you fly by even one or two trips a year can reduce your emissions significantly. You can also offset your air travel by investing in renewable energy projects. 42. Encourage your school or business to reduce emissions You can extend your positive influence on global warming well beyond your home by actively encouraging other to take action. 43. Join the virtual march The Stop Global Warming Virtual March is a non-political effort to bring people concerned about global warming together in one place. Add your voice to the hundreds of thousands of other people urging action on this issue. 44. Encourage the switch to renewable energy Successfully combating global warming requires a national transition to renewable energy sources such as solar, wind and biomass. These technologies are ready to be deployed more widely but there are regulatory barriers impeding them. Take action to break down those barriers with Vote Solar. 45. Protect and conserve forest worldwide Forests play a critial role in global warming: they store carbon. When forests are burned or cut down, their stored carbon is release into the atmosphere - deforestation now accounts for about 20% of carbon dioxide emissions each year. Conservation International has more information on forests and global warming. 46. Consider the impact of your investments If you invest your money, you should consider the impact that your investments and savings will have on global warming. Check out SocialInvest and Ceres to can learn more about how to ensure your money is being invested in companies, products and projects that address issues related to climate change. 47. Make your city cool Cities and states around the country have taken action to stop global warming by passing innovative transportation and energy saving legislation. 194 cities nationwide representing over 40 million people have made this pledge as part of the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement. Find out how to make your city a cool city. 48. Tell Congress to act The McCain Lieberman Climate Stewardship and Innovation Act would set a firm limit on carbon dioxide emissions and then use free market incentives to lower costs, promote efficiency and spur innovation. Tell your representative to support it. 49. Make sure your voice is heard! Americans must have a stronger commitment from their government in order to stop global warming and implement solutions and such a commitment won't come without a dramatic increase in citizen lobbying for new laws with teeth. Get the facts about U.S. politicians and candidates at Project Vote Smart and The League of Conservation Voters. Make sure your voice is heard by voting!

JRW replied: "Google Search of pics related to each of the topics you have addressed above... use key words such as each Water heater blankets.. save a pic of a heater and then one with a blanket... on your puter as an example.. then use the insert command in powerpoint to add it.. you should be able to adjust size in powerpoint to fit your layout... use text block to do your writeups.. and arrows to point to what your talking about... in each block... does this help... You have so many topics above it'll take a little while to get the pics you need... I've done alot of briefings in powerpoint while in the military. Where in South Korea are you?? I spent 3 years stationed over there.. one in Weagan... and 2 in Seoul"

How do I properly insulate a non-conditioned attic with furnace and duct work in an 1860's frame house? I have a 3 story 1860's house with an attic/crawl space above the third floor tucked under the steep roof line. The HVAC guy suggested installing the furnace in this space above the 3rd floor and running ducts down into the 3rd floor rooms. In terms of maximizing efficiency, will it be best to insulate the floor between the 3rd story and the attic, as well as the duct work, or should I also insulate the roof line? I am worried that insulating both the floor and the roof line will cause problems with ventilation and/or trap too much hot air in that space and cause other problems. Thanks.

J.V. replied: "Quite a complex dillema I suggest asking the HVAC guy he should be able to recommend the customization of the insulation to you since he is the one suggesting the type of heating unit you should use. It would be irresponsible of him not to give those recommendations as well."

More Sites
Tags
Roof Framing Terms © 2009

Credit Cards  |  Emo Names  |  Pickup Lines
Report Abuse to: abuse(at)5nxs.com